Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television
has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use
specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Nowadays many products such as TV are very effective on human life. They have some advantages and disadvantages. There is an argument about TV whether has destroyed communication among friends and family. In my opinion, being beneficial or not is completely depends on people’s characteristic. In the following I will explain my point of view in details.
Throughout of day, TV has variety of programs for different ages. There are more than 100 channels that generate many interesting programs. It causes that people always find their favorite programs whenever they turn on TV. In other world, they hang out their leisure time with TV instead of their family. In this situation we can say that watching TV leads to decreasing people’s conversation.
In spite of what has been mentioned in the previous paragraph, it is possible that TV increase communication and discussion between people. Every day all member of a family watch movies, series or world news which are good excuse for having conversation. For example, all member of my family love watching movie. Most of time, we all watch movies together and during watching and after end of movies, we criticize movies, stories and actors. We have a conversation about every scene of those movies at least for couple of hours. Therefore, watching TV, help us to talk about a topic that is everyone's favorite.
In summary, influence of TV on communication among family and friends are very depending of people’s attitudes. The communication can be decreased if people hang out their time for watching TV alone. In addition, TV’s programs such as movies or news can generate many topics for conversation of family members.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-05-21 | Imankhatami | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 67
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places Why do you think people visit museums Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 85
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students Which point of view do you agree with Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s to decreasing people’s conversation. In spite of what has been mentioned in the...
^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... communication among family and friends are very depending of people’s attitudes. The communicatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, at least, for example, in addition, in summary, such as, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11594202899 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90795575607 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 106.607317073 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1624236094 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.3157894737 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5263157895 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871447006661 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320225338449 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482387570472 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654652099664 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444416970284 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.