In the education system, assessment through written formal examinations is valid or not.

Essay topics:

 In the education system, assessment through written formal examinations is valid or not.

Assessment is word which makes everyone shiver. Written assessments are the base of our educational system. But, things are now changing and written examination cannot fulfill the whole criteria oral examination is necessary nowadays. In a further paragraph, we will discuss the written formal examination in the educational system.

Firstly, written assessment is a help to see the effectiveness of the taught lessons in a school. It shows the creativity, thinking the process and to describe the topic in a written form. But, everything you cannot describe in written examination likewise, practical knowledge is also necessary. For example, the operation is done by a doctor provided that, they know how to do it. They have to practice a practical process. Therefore, it exemplifies that educational system should add practical assessment which helps them to use their learned lessons.

Secondly, sometimes written assessment is not the whole of the educational system, if a student is sick and he is not able to write the examination and give in full potential, Therefore, the student cannot convey their answer, write in a full speed. It exemplifies, that written examination is not the whole education system there should be practical as well as.

In the conclusion, written examination only shows creativity and thinking in writing but, if you want to describe in a speech or practical form you should have to add oral or practical assessment in the educational system.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29661016949 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03073644537 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504237288136 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.7963087035 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1538461538 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382728818847 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157343309787 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115011488196 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268138145888 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100109383901 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.