Example 6: income gap between man and woman from 1978 to 2008.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of income gap between genders in five different countries namely Japan, the US, the UK, France, and Australia over the period of 30 years starting from 1978.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clearly evident that the percentage of difference in income between men and women saw a decrease for most of the period. However, after 1998, there was a rapid growth witnessed in Australia.
There was a considerable decline in the income gap between men and women in Japan from almost 50% to 40% over the time frame. A similar pattern could be seen in the US, which fell evidently to 28% in 2007 despite reaching 35% in 1978.
At the beginning of the period, the proportion of the difference in payment between two genders in the Uk and France saw a gradual reduction. That in the UK was falling from nearly 30% to 25% while a decline from nearly 20% to over 15% could be seen in France. In contrast, the figure for Australia reached a lowest peak at 27% in 1978, then saw a down trend in the 20 years later and it skyrocketed to stand at 25% at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...trast, the figure for Australia reached a lowest peak at 27% in 1978, then saw a ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42233009709 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43726547267 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529126213592 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8569089738 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208888260238 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945089102675 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755341619533 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148450384873 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529301718725 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.