The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts present the information about the use of various types of energy by an average Australian family and the amount of greenhouse gas produced by such use. As an overall trend, water heating appears to be the major activity that both consumes a substantial energy amount and causes notable greenhouse gas emissions, while heating accounts for the highest percentage of energy use.
As it can be seen on the charts, cooling and lighting require insignificant amounts of energy, 2% and 4% respectively, and they emit in considerable greenhouse gas volumes, 3% and 8%. On the other hand, the share of refrigeration in energy use does not exceed 7%, whilst its greenhouse effect is twice as large, 14%. As far as other appliances are concerned, their respective rates have 15% and 28%. As for water heating, which uses about 30% of energy, it tends to emit about the same amount of greenhouse gas, 32%. The reverse situation can be observed for heating which shows almost half of the entire energy consumption, whereas its greenhouse emissions constitute only 15%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
2020-01-08 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
2020-01-03 | sana_em | 67 | view |
2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 73 | view |
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 61
- The table below shows the number of visitors to four museums in the city Carlsburg over 10 years from 1995 to 2004 80
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today In the not too distant future technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00555555556 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77174344563 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3321297583 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28519420475 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125661287467 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948183428607 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232125210694 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615238960186 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.