The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa

The first pie chart illustrates energy consumption in a typical Australian house, while the second one shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions from the use of this energy. Overall, water heating and heating consume the most energy and thus constitute a significant proportion of gas emission.

According to the first chart, the largest amount of energy is used for heating(42%) and just under a third for water heating(30% ), while refrigeration consumes almost 7% of energy. The least amount is used for cooling(just 2%), which consumes two times less than lighting(4%), and the remaining 15% is accounted for by a range of other energy consumers.

The second chart shows that water heating has the largest proportion of gas emissions, roughly one third(32%). Heating and refrigeration share almost similar proportion, 15% and 14% respectively. Moreover, lighting accounted for just 8%, while cooling is responsible for a mere (3%) among the other factors. The remaining 28% was allocated to a variety of other appliances.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... just under a third for water heating30% , while refrigeration consumes almost 7% ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, third, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97503633691 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9479471402 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251023246768 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108208795376 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125716156 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184563475009 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107128815225 0.0819641961636 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.