The following diagrams shows a current map of Peyton Park and plans for proposed changes.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant.
The following illustrations show the comparison between the existing landmarks inside Peyton Park and the suggested innovations proposed for the renovation of the park.
In the first diagram, the lake occupies the center of the park and the different amenities surround it. The car park is located at the south end while tables are seen in the north end for visitors who wants to have a picnic in the park. A tennis court is also available just west of the lake.
The proposed changes are seen in the second diagram. First, the tennis court will be move on the east side of the lake. Second, in place of the former is an added feature which is a swimming dock. Lastly, the picnic areas will be move to the left to make room for another added feature, the playground. The lake and the parking lot’s location will remain unchanged.
In summary, the major changes proposed in the renovation of Peyton Park include moving of the tennis court and picnic area. As well as, the addition of new amenities which are the play zone and swimming dock.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, second, so, well, while, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70810810811 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39933031806 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6202539487 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1818181818 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192915997683 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705358081896 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729423410064 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131649486611 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788163067833 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.