The following table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant..
The table provides data on the quality of life measured in four main features- GNP per head, amount of calories daily supplied, life expectancy and infant mortality- among five countries. At a first glimpse, the graph describes that overall the US experienced a higher quality of life, reporting best performances within each aspect whereas Bangladesh reported the worst expectations.
In detail, US citizens were provided with the highest daily amount of calories- accounting 3653 per person- exceeding the following rate- reported by Egypt-with 2950 calories per head. Indonesia, Bolivia and Bangladesh citizens were supplied with a lower amount- assessing 2296, 2086 and 1877 calories respectively. Not only American toddlers experienced the lowest rate of infant mortality- only 12 deaths per 1000 live births- but also they forecast the longest life expectancy- assessed 74 years at birth against the 49 years reported in Egypt, that reached the second place, followed by Bolivia, Indonesia and Bangladesh.
In conclusion, the graph highlights that US citizens enjoyed a higher quality of life within every aspect whilst Bangladesh reported the lowest quality in 4 features of the 5 mentioned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'reporting the best'.
Suggestion: reporting the best
...S experienced a higher quality of life, reporting best performances within each aspect whereas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53804347826 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82072547446 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635869565217 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9034630922 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.833333333 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193958837826 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104460268761 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784248673985 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160761655177 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817438487039 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.