Frequency of eating at fast food restaurants among people in the usa
The bar graph illustrates the frequency of eating at fast-food restaurants among USA citizens in the year 2003, 2006 and 2013.
The horizontal axis of the graph is categorized by daily, weekly, monthly, yearly and never visit the restaurant respectively, while the vertical axis shows the percentage of people in these categories.
Overall, there has been an increase in the number of people who visit the fast-food restaurant as the percentage of people who have never visited have fallen by 1%, but similarly, the people who visit daily have also fallen by 1% from 2003 to 2013
In the given time period the percentage of people who used to visit on a weekly basis shown an uprise in the year 2006 and then downfall in the year 2013.
Furthermore, the people who used to visit on a monthly basis decreased substantially from the year 2003 to 2006 then increased surprisingly in the year 2013.
People who used to eat on a yearly basis shown an uprise to 15% from the year 2003 to 2006 then remained the same until 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...izontal axis of the graph is categorized by daily, weekly, monthly, yearly and ne...
^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o used to visit on a weekly basis shown an uprise in the year 2006 and then downfall in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 48, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...who used to eat on a yearly basis shown an uprise to 15% from the year 2003 to 2006 then ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60442998669 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466666666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.431795924 43.030603864 243% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.6 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25158923217 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171229342426 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176908372353 0.0843802449381 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15279060036 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168916109347 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.