Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
In a new era of marvelous innovation, some argue about the reduction in funding of art and redirecting of the funds to rather more ambitious projects like space exploration. However, I strongly disagree with such an argument, I am much more intrigued in supporting the funding for arts and deliberate expansion of provisions in the different fields of art.
One reason for us to not undermine the art and its aspects lyes in the very bedrock of human history. As we became civilized with the building block of art. similarly, certain paradigm of it is seen in age of renaissance when overcame medieval age the new art forms like writing, paintings, and ideas which rose from the poems of great poets.so if we are to ignore art it means we are ignoring a very core structural pillar of our modern civilization.
Secondly, if we see through the very quotes of different philosophers and scholars who did research on such view their remarks of it was simple chaos. furthermore, observing oneself we can understand how much part art plays in our daily lives, such as, our morning commute a playground for us to experience and feel art it's everywhere, the way people put their attire, the design on it and the design of the cartoon u just saw on your morning newspaper that is all art .
Summarizing all the points like any other thinker I can say that our ignorance of art can lead to a chaotic and colorless society. instead of reducing the funding of art this is the era of increasing the funding instead of spending on wars and weapons, we should spend on imagination and innovation which will lead us to a prosperous world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s in the very bedrock of human history. As we became civilized with the building b...
^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...vilized with the building block of art. similarly, certain paradigm of it is seen in age ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...w their remarks of it was simple chaos. furthermore, observing oneself we can understand ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 321, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...round for us to experience and feel art its everywhere, the way people put their at...
^^^
Line 17, column 469, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n your morning newspaper that is all art . Summarizing all the points like...
^^
Line 23, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...ead to a chaotic and colorless society. instead of reducing the funding of art this is ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77972027972 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76454433619 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.7746445976 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.888888889 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7777777778 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107295619714 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473269188964 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0206222358967 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064245783922 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00614826351689 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.