Fun Money World Entertainment Market
Source : Booz Allen & Hamilton
The chart shows how money was spend different five subject in three countries between 1995 and 2000. Overall, United States has higher spent money than Asia and Europe and from five subject in United States has been dominated by publishing between 1990 and 2000.
In 1990, the fun money at Asia was started with 67 billion, the lowest among the three countries. Europe has begun with 97 billion while United States started at 184 billion, the highest among these countries. About subject, television on the top among five subject in three countries with United States started around 125 billion become the highest spend money about television and Asia started at 45 billion become the lowest spend money about television. Finally, in 2000, the fun money in three countries has been increased from one decade also United States has the highest fun money with 257 billion, more reached than one decade and Asia has the lowest fun money with 110 billion, although more reached than before. About subject, three countries have different top of value money. Europe have different with Asia and United States which subject dominated is television with value at 90 billion beaten Asia but lose with United States. But Asia and United States have two dominated subject with different value. Which United States become the highest value television and publishing than Asia with value of television approximately 75 billion and publishing approximately 100 billion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
The chart shows how money was spend different five subject in three countri...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ve different top of value money. Europe have different with Asia and United States w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18220338983 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27789216864 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.372881355932 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1125947878 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0793224701191 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436177594624 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463711067167 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640225093175 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128514795458 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.