The given graph shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in 4 countries.
Write a report for a university lecture making comparisons where relevant and
reporting the main features.
countries. The data has been calibrated in thousand pounds sterling.
From an overall perspective, it is noticeable that Britain was the leading country out
of the 4 countries in terms of expenditure on all 6 different consumer goods. Britain's
maximum expenditure was on Photographic film at approximately 172, closely followed by
Toys and CDs at 168 each. It spent an equal amount on Tennis racquets and Personal stereos.
France's largest expenditure was on Photographic film and it spent an equal amount on
Toys and CD's at 158. It spent the least on Tennis racquets.
Moving further, it is observable that Italy's expenditure has always been more as
compared to Germany in all consumer goods categories. Italy spent the maximum on Toys
closely followed by Photographic film and the least on Personal stereos at 150. Germany spent
the most on Tennis racquets and the least amounts on Photographic film and CDs.
In a nutshell, it is crystal clear that Britain has always done the maximum expenditure
as compared to the other four countries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Countries
countries. The data has been calibrated in thousa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ntries. The data has been calibrated in thousand pounds sterling. From an overall persp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...Italys expenditure has always been more as compared to Germany in all consumer go...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17441860465 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9073953187 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4843391249 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0883296348214 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419587292115 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279086066625 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0353232124635 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347572250644 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.