The given tabular chart reveals the information about for different secondary schools attended by pupils in what proportion among the years 2000, 2005, and 2009.
The given tabular chart reveals the information about four different Secondary Schools attended by proportion of pupils among the years 2000, 2005 and 2009. The data is calibrated in percentum.
To begin, the proportion in voluntary controlled schools fell from just over half to only 20 % or One fifth from 2000 to 2009. Similarly, the number of children in Grammar Schools declined half from the ratio of students from voluntary controlled schools in same period. As for the specialist schools, the relatively small percentage of pupils attending this type of school also fell, although not significantly.
However, while other three types of school declined in importance. After that, only a small majority of 12% were educated in these schools in 2000, this figure increased to 58% among pupils during the following nine years.
Overall, it is evident that, voluntary controlled schools were leading as compared to other schools in the starting years, while in the last year community schools replaced their position and became first preference of children for education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The data is calibrated in percentum. To begin, the proportion in voluntary co...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37647058824 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67988158871 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0999946213 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402234091095 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17920354108 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.258246904686 0.0843802449381 306% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282694975815 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.266959863083 0.0819641961636 326% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.