Global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or Video
The bar chart given below illustration the Global sales of games software, SDs and DVD or video among four years. It can be seen that the most positive movement from Global sales was DVD or Video. In contrast, Global sales of CDs decreased gradually
From 2000, global sales of games software was lower rose than DVD/video during four years. There was a minimal increase of 1 in sales each year for games software, reached a peak at 19 in 2010. While sales of DVD/video started with higher sale than games software in early year then was positive alteration diverge every year. In the second year global sales of DVD/Video saw a significant growth from 19 to 21 between 2000 and 2001. Whereas indicated a big boom from 21 to 28 in third year. But DVD/Video sales registered a minimal climb between 2002 and 2003, with percentage was smaller than occurred in the previous year
During four years, CDs sales as the only sales that had an enormous reduce of 3 between 2000 and 2003. Whereas in the beginning years CDs sales was the hugest global sales then showed a negative movement cause decreased of 1 every year. But amount global sales of CDs at the end of the year exposed CDs sales stable as the biggest global sales compared with two others sale although between 2000 and 2003 had a gradual decline
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...software, reached a peak at 19 in 2010. While sales of DVD/video started with higher ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...th from 19 to 21 between 2000 and 2001. Whereas indicated a big boom from 21 to 28 in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mous reduce of 3 between 2000 and 2003. Whereas in the beginning years CDs sales was th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64655172414 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26202362759 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504310344828 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.694667722 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.542611508218 0.215688989381 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261037349871 0.103423049105 252% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123703041953 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.4304286254 0.15604864568 276% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117540383303 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.