Goods transported in UK
As we can see, the line graph illustrates the number of goods transported through four different means in the UK between the years 1974 to 2002, measured in millions.
Overall, the most popular form of transporting goods in the UK was by road, whereas pipeline was the least used method from all. While rail and water were used the same amount in the year 1974; however, this practice was changed during the year 2002 making water more popular than rail.
From the years 1974 to 2002, most of the goods in the UK were transported by road. In 1974, almost 70 million tons of goods were transporting through roads, the roads transportation rate of goods per million tons remained almost stable for the next twelve years until 1982, it steadily rose just above 80 million ton by the year 1994. Before declining 1 million tons in 1998, roads skyrocketed reaching just below 100 million tons making this the highest used form of transportation by the year 2002. Moving towards pipeline, it followed the same order as roads, starting from 2 million tons and ending at the bottom with just above 20 million tons.
The last two categories, water, and rail were transporting an equal amount of goods around 40 million ton in the year 1974. During the following years, water jumped to around 62 million tons, while rail showed a gradual decline over the years but came out to be just above 40 million by the end of the year 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...02 making water more popular than rail. From the years 1974 to 2002, most of the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...ds were transporting through roads, the roads transportation rate of goods per millio...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...40 million by the end of the year 2002.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69322709163 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34600807941 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525896414343 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2746757592 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.888888889 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267749970696 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160642264717 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145536424964 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19390424375 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730989059544 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.