Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Urbanization and population booming are putting great pressure on the trasportation system. Some people reckon that governments should invest in railways instead of roads. From my perspective, I totally agree with that opinion.
The core reason for constructing railways rather than roads is due to the carrying capacity. While roads help people move individually, railways can transport about hundreads of passengers stimultaneously. This is an effective mean of transportation for carrying a huge amount of passengers. A research conducted on the effectiveness of facility land using in Giai Phong road in Hanoi by University of Transport and Communications in2018 indicated that the road can only carry 5 people but the railway can carry about 30 people in 20 square meters in one minute. Therefore, railways can hold much more passengers than the roads.
In addition, railways obviously go faster than walking because they do not struggle with traffic congestion that most road users experience. If a person chooses to catch a coach from Hanoi to Nam Dinh, it would take about 2 hours but with train, they need to spend only about 1 hour. Therefore, people save time and effort to do other things.
In conclusion, railways not only contain more passengers but also move quicker than road. Governments are recommended to develop railway system rather than road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
... can carry about 30 people in 20 square meter in one minute. Therefore, railways can ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to walk'.
Suggestion: to walk
...aster than walking. If a person chooses walking from Hanoi to Nam Dinh, it would take a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30729166667 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00212869356 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661458333333 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.1858893911 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9166666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230707728599 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843423203347 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461573217832 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130865584614 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126193905629 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.