The graph and table below give infomation about for new painkilling drugs which have recently been tested on patients. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart and table show the prices of four different painkilling drugs, and patient response relates to the effectiveness.
The most pricey paintkilling drug is Herbelieve with £2.40, although the proportion of patient responses regarding the effectiveness shows not effective. This because a minority of patients responded that the reaction of Herbelieve less than 10 minutes, while about the effectiveness only 12% patients said very effective. This contrasted to Asprobeta which is the cheapest one, yet it shows more effective because there is a significant proportion of very effective responses.
Morever, Iburight and Paradocs experience a slight differences of the price with £1.80 and £1.70 subsequently. Afterwards, how about the effects? Either Iburight and Paradocs also have a similar effects for the patients with the proportion of effectiveness just slightly above 50%, while respond for speed of killing reached 39% for the last two drugs.
Overall, drugs’ prices are not represent the quality of such drugs itself, and its suggests for those who looking for painkilling drug to purchase Asprobeta.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 197, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...uright and Paradocs also have a similar effects for the patients with the proportion of...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing reached 39% for the last two drugs. Overall, drugs' prices are not repr...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 37, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'represented'.
Suggestion: represented
... Overall, drugs' prices are not represent the quality of such drugs itself, and i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03605211694 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635294117647 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8524751188 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108039989163 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492322038438 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390966046981 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741312534361 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365979984855 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.