The graph and table below give information about water use
worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The given line graph and the table detail the statistical report on water usage at the global levels and in two countries(Brazil and the democratic republic of congo) in three sectors including domestic, industrial, and agricultural over a century from 1900 to 2000.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a significant increase in water usage in all the sectors, the agricultural sector continued to lead the chart. Moreover, being the largest in size, Brazil reported the maximum water consumption per person.
According to the given illustration, in 1900, nearly 500 square km of the agricultural land was consuming global water, while only 1 to 2 square km was noticed in the domestic and industrial areas. Over time, whilst domestic and the industrial areas leveled off for consecutive 30 years in a row, the same rose steadily to cover 1000 square km of the agricultural land. With the passing years, besides an upward trend in all the sectors, global water covered a peak of 3000 square km of agricultural land, whereas the same restricted to just a third and one-eight of the industrial and domestic lands in 2000.
Turning to the table, with a maximum of 176 million population, Brazil utilized most of the water to irrigate 26 500 square km of land as against only 5.2 million population and just 100 square km area in congo. Also, Brazil reported nearly 45 times more water consumption per person as compared to only 8 cubic meters in congo in the year 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: largest
... to lead the chart. Moreover, being the largest in size, Brazil reported the maximum water cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, moreover, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98039215686 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79053158249 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4026689482 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.75 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.875 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140971247061 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727868262557 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442602442184 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101700498203 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366602303549 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.