The graph provides the information about global water consumption by 3 different sectors, which are agriculture, industrial and domestic. Consumption scale is shown by zero to 3000 cubic km with several years. Years are divided into 10, between 1900 and 2000. On the other hand, the table shows water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000. The table provides the information about both countries' population, irrigated land and water consumption per person. In 2000, water usage has reached the peak level of all sectors.
It can be seen from the graph, agriculture has taken the biggest share among other sectors. Water usage has increased steadily but then skyrocketed. This situation may be stemmed from the Industrial Revolution. Because industrial use scale has been constant for 40 years until 1940 after that industrial usage increased sharply than domestic use. After 1940, domestic consumption has increased steadily by the way. Irrigation consumption was greater than for other purposes.
When we look at the table, Brazil's population more than 30 times of Congo's. To provide food for these people, people and government may be engaged in more effectively than Congo. Irrigated land in Brazil stretched to 26,500 square km but in Congo was just 100. It is not a surprising point that Brazil's consumption per person was almost 45 times more than Congo's. While Brazil's consumption per person was 359 cubic km with 176 million population, Congo's was 8 with 5.2 million people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ble provides the information about both countries population, irrigated land and water co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, then, while, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20416666667 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68894018259 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1196247843 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4705882353 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1176470588 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194779994289 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696360723525 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859731144436 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140730764865 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121400561883 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.