The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
The line graph illustrate the amount of water used globally from 1900 to 2000, by three categories, while the table shows the water consumption rate between Brazil and Congo in 2000 and it includes, the number of people and space occupied by these people in square km.
Overall, there was a general increase in water usage for agriculture, industry and domestics. However, agriculture used plenty of water above other 2 categories. Brazil had a bigger population which occupied vast space of land and consumed large amount of water compared to Congo.
There was highest increase usage of water by agriculture from 1900 to 2000, which saw an increase from approximately 500cubic km in 1900 to about 3000 cubic km in 2000. Industrial and domestic services used an equal amount of water from 1900 to 1920, at an estimated 0.1 cubic km. From 1920, domestics remained constant in average water usage, until 1950, when it rose steadily to about 300 cubic km in 2000, while industries had a gradual increase from 1920 to 1950, when it fluctuated dramatically to approximately 1000 cubic km in 2000.
Furthermore, Brazil had a large population of 176 million which occupied 26.500km and consumed large amount of water, at 359 cubic metres. DRC had the least number of people compared to Brazil, living in a small piece of land of 100 square km and consumption rate was 8 cubic metres per person for the whole year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 7, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... of water compared to Congo. There was highest increase usage of water by agriculture ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... water compared to Congo. There was highest increase usage of water by agric...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.925 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62090951135 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495833333333 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9266333712 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181527159859 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930031756212 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512218281397 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130644291858 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566141939447 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.