An outcome of a study done to get an incite of the drive for adults to study as illustrated by the bar graph percentagewise, whereas the pie chart display an estimated distrubution on the cost of adult education as a percentage.
An overview of the bar chart shows interest in a subject as the best drive to study. It is also noticeable that few people study to socialise, whereas, there is an equal figure which is also half of the total number of people who study to improve prospects of promotion and out of their enjoyment to learn or study. Surprisingly, a lot of people suggest that a person should sponsor his or her studies, as a few people agrees that tax payer should contribute to adult education.
The bar graph shows that 40 percent of the adults study the subject they are interested in. The number of adults who study to gain qualifications is 2 percent lower than those who study out of interest. From the survey, it is evident that an equal number of people study to improve their chances of promotion and due to their enjoyment to learn, which is also half of the total percentage of those interested in a subject. Furthermore, few individuals study to meet people as it is at 9 percent. There is an insignificant difference of 3 percent between those who study to change their jobs and those for socialisation.
However, people have their perspective on distrubution of educational cost. Highlighted on the pie chart, 40 percent of the people agree that an individual should contribute for his or her own education, whereas 35 percent thinks that the employer should also contribute and the last group which is 25 percent of the people suggest that the tax payer should chip in.
To sum up, there are three groups of peoplewho were grouped in accordance with their views on sharing of the cost. It is also of note that there are different drives for education as shown on the bar graph.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
An outcome of a study done to get an incite of the drive for adults to study as ill...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment to learn, which is also half of the total percentage of those interested in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 3.15609756098 507% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 338.0 196.424390244 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67455621302 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76122217269 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42899408284 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 283.868780488 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8917167553 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.538461538 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208666539466 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835414388391 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06526917319 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127791188882 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623234274213 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.