The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of annual hours of sunshine in three major cities Summarise the information by seleting ad reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of annual hours of sunshine in three major cities. Summarise the information by seleting ad reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph reflects the information of depicts the monthly average temperature and The table depicts the idea about average number of sunlight per year in three cities such as london, newyork and sydney. We can see that sydney has a higher temperature rather than london and newyork over the period. Also, newyork was the highest number of hours of sunlight in three major cities.

Overall, it can clearly seen that london and newyork reach their peaks around july and august, while sydney hits the lowest point at the same period.

To begin with, it shows that the average of monthly temperatures in Sydney was decreased before it gets a massive at the end of month. This figure was stood at under 25 in January. While, this trend had remained stable over the next three months before it experienced a dramatic decline at around 16 in July. There was a significant increase at 25 in the end of period, with the total annual hours of sunshine at 2,535.

Moving to a more detailed analysis from the graph and table, it reveals that London and New York temperatures had a similar pattern, even though both figures had a big gap for the total annual hours of sunshine. Both figures stood at under ten, and then increased slightly over the next six months before those figures fell back at under ten. Finally, the total annual hours of sunshine in London and New York were 1,180 and 2,535 respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...igure was stood at under 25 in January. While, this trend had remained stable over th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then, while, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74898785425 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30526187805 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5383038656 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207585867913 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083670044479 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795278799718 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115634029239 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893385932223 0.0819641961636 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.