The given line graph illustrates that what was the temperature in three different cities (London, New York, Sydney), whereas table reveals the average of yearly hours of sunshine in same cities.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that in the starting of the year there is the highest temperature which remained approximately similarly after fluctuating till the ending of the year.
It is crystal clear that New York and London see the lowest temperatures in the first month of the year which are around 10 and 5 degree Celsius respectively, starts increasing dramatically which is recorded nearly 15 degree celsius in the month of April followed by Sydney which has the maximum temperature (more than 25 degree Celsius) stars dropping in July and reaches at the data of 15 degree Celsius. However, London and New York overtake the temperature of Sydney in the same month, have the vast average of temperature. Further, the temperature of Sydney rises sharply from August in which it is almost 20 degree Celsius crosses the of 25 degree celsius in the last month followed by both remain cities which are decreasing regarding temperature, have least temperature (almost 5 degree celsius) in the same period.
Moving further, New York has the maximum average of sunshine hours (2535 hours) which is almost double of the date of London (1080). Sydney is recorded as the second highest City regarding Sunshine hours which has 2423 hours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rature in three different cities London, New York, Sydney, whereas table reveals ...
^^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the least'.
Suggestion: have the least
...h are decreasing regarding temperature, have least temperature almost 5 degree celsius in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mum average of sunshine hours 2535 hours which is almost double of the date of Lo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03797468354 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61039954046 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497890295359 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.582967914 43.030603864 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.571428571 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8571428571 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167535381542 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10402206562 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067100110257 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132265672696 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071648011405 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.