The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The graph includes information from Annual Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy, which have been generated from 6 different sources, in the us from 1980 to 2012 with projected consumption until 2030. The units are measured in Quadrillion.
Overall, it is clear that the most of american energy needs have been provided from fossil fuels and projection, which was estimated by this institute, shows that this trend will continue until 2030.
In 1980, 35q of Petrol and oil was consumed in the us while this figure for coal and natural gas stood at about 16q and 20q respectively. Despite some fluctuation in consumption of oil, this source has risen by nearly 7q and reach 42q in 2012.Acording to this graph, this rising trend will continue until 2030, with figure rising to about 50q. coal and natural gas went two different paths, but both of them reach a same point (about 25q) in 2012. while consumption of natural gas will remain at this level, a 7q increase was projected for coal consumption until last year of given period.
At the beginning of the period, about 4q of each other sources were consumed by americans. A gradual increase was seen in consumption of energy which was produced from nuclear source, with figure rising to nearly 8q in 2012. until 2025 consumption of this source will be remained constant before rising to 9q in last year. In spite of many changes in consumption of renewable source, by 2005, both of them had risen by 1q and reached the same level. After this time, two different trends were reported for them. while hydropower remains stable at this figure, sustainable source of energy rises gradually, and reaches 6q in 2012 and 7q in 2030
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is trend will continue until 2030. In 1980, 35q of Petrol and oil was consu...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Acording
...isen by nearly 7q and reach 42q in 2012.Acording to this graph, this rising trend will c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coal
... 2030, with figure rising to about 50q. coal and natural gas went two different path...
^^^^
Line 13, column 447, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...m reach a same point about 25q in 2012. while consumption of natural gas will remain ...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Until
...ith figure rising to nearly 8q in 2012. until 2025 consumption of this source will be...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “until” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ith figure rising to nearly 8q in 2012. until 2025 consumption of this source will be...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 513, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ifferent trends were reported for them. while hydropower remains stable at this figur...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8892733564 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54166322769 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519031141869 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0812357826 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270904314384 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963269204336 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105138041775 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201403732731 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120332539157 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.