The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The given chart illustrates how has energy been consumed in Ameria from 1980 with predictions until 2030. Unit are measured in quadrillion.
Overall, fossil fuels have been the dominant type and will continue this trend in the future. On the contrary, the popularity of hydropower has been low and experts said that it would become most unpopular energy in last years.
In 1980, petrol and oil accounted for the biggest share with 35 Quadrillion units. The figure for them witnessed a slightly upward fluctuation and stood at under 50 quadrillion in 2030. A relatively similar pattern could be seen in the figure for coal, which started at roughly 16 quadrillion and its ending point was about 30 quadrillion. Although natural gas was more popular than coal at the outset, the consumption of it was less than coal 4 quadrillion units in 2030.
Three less favourable types of energy in the US were consumed about 4 quadrillion units in 1980. Over the period of time, Americans have been use more nuclear and solar energy, the consumption of them would be more than 5 quadrillion and exactly 5 quadrillion respectively in 2030, while only about 3 quadrillion hydropower would be used.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 107, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t 4 quadrillion units in 1980. Over the period of time, Americans have been use more nuclear a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0351758794 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75737027456 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608040201005 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7880295049 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146832664733 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651007586177 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686967181033 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105170072207 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704447498072 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.