The information about the utilization of energy in the USA from 1980 to 2030 with the prediction from a 2008 report is depicted by the rendered line chart. The data has been calibrated in quadrillion units.
To begin with, 35 quadrillion units of power used by petrol and oil in 1980. There was a fluctuating increase noticed in the usage of power until 2005, which was increased by 5 in 2005. However, after that, the utilization of energy increased dramatically and also this trend will continue in the future until 2030. Moreover, 20 and 15 Quadrillion units of energy were consumed in 1980 by Natural gas and coal respectively. Although there had been fluctuated increase noticed in the usage of energy by coal and natural gas in 2010, it accounted for 22 and 23 correspondingly, then the usage of coal increased rapidly with the projection of 2030, it will be increased by 8. However, the utilization of energy by natural gas will be similar in the estimated 2030 in comparison to the past.
Moving towards, in 1980, 3 quadrillion units of energy consumed by nuclear, solar and hydropower. Despite the utilization of energy by nuclear and solar increased steadily until 2005, a drastic increase will be seen in the usage of energy by these two fuels with projections until 2030, it will be comprised for 6 and 5 respectively. In addition, there was a fluctuating decrease observed in the usage of energy by hydropower, it will be decreased by 1, which will be accounted for 3.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the highest energy utilization was seen by petrol and oil throughout the span and it will continue in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79298245614 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89422430338 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442105263158 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3167505178 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.833333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183812441638 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805966518507 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972534805269 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139115867063 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113361427191 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.