The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates numerical data of a report in 2008 about energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with prospective plans until 2030. Overall, petrol and oil increased dramatically and so did the coal, whereas the other ones: natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower energies fluctuated and remained unchanged.
As it can be seen, pertrol and oil were at the lowest point in 1985 (a little higher than 30%) and from then it began to go up remarkably proved by reaching a peak at approximately 45% in 2020 and predicted to increase continually to the highest: 50%. Similarly, the coal’s energy consumption in 2020 was 11% more higher than it was in the year 1980. Besides, it is going to go upward in the future to nearly 31%. In contrast, the usage of natural gas went upward and downward a lot which demonstrated by 20% in 1980 to 24% in 2000 then decreased to 22% ten years later but it will remain steady as it was in 2015 till now. The hydropower tended to go up and down: 4% in 2005 to 2% in 2015 and have the same tendency to remain unchanged. However, nuclear and solar/ wind power were at 4% in 1980 and increase more and more in the previous years as well as it will the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... report in 2008 about energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with prospective p...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...al’s energy consumption in 2020 was 11% more higher than it was in the year 1980. Besides, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, similarly, so, then, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46606334842 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59711951796 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2143721018 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138681976969 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067714952999 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123785995842 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147813621927 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103931802887 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.