The graph below gives information about U.S. government spending on research between 1980 and 2008
The line graph displays information on the amount of money that U.S authorities spent on research related to health, space, energy, general science, and other areas between 1980 and 2008.
As can be seen from the graph, government spending on healthcare in the United States recorded a tremendous increase over the period shown, while the other three subjects including astronomy, energy studies, and scientific fields climbed marginally. On the contrary, U.S authority expenditure on other domains saw a significant drop in 2008.
In 1980, it is explicitly observed that the United States invested the greatest deal of money into medicine, following it respectively are other categories in the second-highest, universe and power studies stood in the third and fourth, and finally, scientific majors got the least funds from U.S. authorities. However, within a period of 20 years, whereas the money that other fields received from the government sank to the lowest at 5 billion in 2008, the figure for health studies rocketed to a peak at somewhere between 20 and 25 billion dollars, before slipping back to approximately 17 billion.
As for the other domains, particularly research on the cosmos, power resources, and science, they all witnessed overall upward trends. To be more precise, astronomy and general science rose steadily, while the figure for energy remained stable for most of 28 years, however, it experienced a partial growth between 1992 and 2000 before surging to 8 billion dollars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...formation on the amount of money that U.S authorities spent on research related t...
^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... climbed marginally. On the contrary, U.S authority expenditure on other domains ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, as for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32773109244 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81159944664 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613445378151 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3774159271 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.142857143 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182889539834 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828639088707 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756297727759 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122506301868 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082426830722 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.