The graph below gives information from one 2018 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2023.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information from a 2018 survey about energy consumption in America since 1980 with projections until 2030.
It is clearly seen that petrol and oil are the most energy consumed in the USA. Meanwhile, nuclear, solar/wind, and hydropower are the least consumption of energy.
In 1980, the consumption of petrol and oil stood at the highest number of 35 quadrillions, followed by a sustainable increase to 41q in 2010. This upward trend is predicted to continue until 2030 with around roughly 50q consumed in America. Natural gas and coal were the second and third energy used in 1980, with around 20q and 16q respectively. Whilst coal is forecast to rise steadily over the years and ends at nearly 30q in 2030, natural gas is likely to reach 24q in 2015 and remain stable until the end of the period.
In contrast, nuclear, solar/wind, and hydropower stood at just 4q in 1980. In the following years, usage of nuclear and solar/wind witnessed a slight rise to over 5q, but the opposite is true for hydropower. In 2030, nuclear, solar/wind, and hydropower are expected to reach the mark of 6q, 5q, and 2q in the order, still lower than other types of energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ut the opposite is true for hydropower. In 2030, nuclear, solar/wind, and hydropow...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, still, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78921568627 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66260413586 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1715713014 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175279027939 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771600198778 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124731089853 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152885694084 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170242729965 0.0819641961636 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.