The graph below show gives information about the price of bananas in four different countries between 1994 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below show gives information about the price of bananas in four different countries between 1994 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the price of bananas in four different countries from 1994 to 2004.
Overall, the price of bananas in Japan exhibited the highest prices, whereas those in USA were the lowest-price. Additionally, the amount of time to increasing in France and Japan was comparatively longer when compared to other nations.
The price of bananas in Germany and USA was under decreased that period time. The prices of bananas in Japan in 1994 was highest one among all these 4 countries ( about 3 USD). But after 1994, it gradually decrease to about 2 USD( 1998). The price in Germany was around 1,5 USD at the beginning, then it steadily increased till 1,9 USD. However, in 1999 it got tremendous in the price of bananas which significantly increasing till 2007( 2 USD). The price in USA was at the same price with Germany and France in 1999 and 2004- around 1,3 and 1,8 USD. Meanwhile, the prices in Japan have the significantly decrease from 3 USD to 2,5 USD.
The changes in price of bananas can be connected with the changes in economical development and appearance of some new market which reduce price.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... The prices of bananas in Japan in 1994 was highest one among all these 4 countries about ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... highest one among all these 4 countries about 3 USD. But after 1994, it graduall...
^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...out 3 USD. But after 1994, it gradually decrease to about 2 USD 1998. The price in Germa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...as can be connected with the changes in economical development and appearance of some new ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71134020619 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6537131805 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.210116078 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185510418365 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963136183219 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989714852758 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158073906866 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132353739348 0.0819641961636 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.