The graph below shows the acid level in mouth from consumption of sugar and honey. Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values).
The supplied line graph comapares the acidity caused by three sweet items such as; fruit sugar, cane sugar nad honey over time. Acidity of mouth is measured by its pH level.
Overall, it is evident that cane sugar is more likely to cause tooth decay, because the pH of mouth remains in danger level for maximum time as compare to other sweet items. While, pH level of mouth after the consumption of honey remains in danger level for minimum amount of time.
Now, turning to details initially at the moment of consumption of sugar in any of the three given forms, the pH level remains 7, followed by below 5.5 after certain amount of time depending upon the source of sugar. After five minutes of the consumption of sugar, the pH level of fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey declines to (just under 5, below 5.5 and 3.5 respectively).
After that, the trend of pH level because of honey stabalizes, whereas; the pH level of fruit sugar increases to about 5, after 10 minutes of sugar consumption. The pH level due to fruit sugar after 18 minutes and that of honey after 12 minutes increases and comes out of the danger of tooth decay. Turning to the pH trend of cane sugar, it remains in danger for nearly about 32 minutes. The pH level of mouth again becomes 7 after 40 minutes of sugar consumption.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55319148936 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27731545593 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43829787234 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0230153156 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359153587754 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196405297864 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988999512355 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262261892007 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078674791894 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.