The graph below shows the acid level in mouth from consumption of sugar and honey Eating sweet food produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay

The line graph show the information of sweet products like fruit sugar, cane sugar and honey produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay.

After analyzing, it can be seen clearly that after consumption of the cane sugar within 5 minutes PH level dramatically decline and each 5 minutes grow up the PH level with eat the sweet products and in 35 to 40 minutes PH level of the peak stage. In contrast, with the eating fruit sugar within 5 to 10 minutes PH level near about 3.5 and 5 then in 20 minutes PH level is 5.5 in the 40 minutes PH Level is 7.

The picture further collates that taking the honey product in 5 minutes PH level less than 5 and this level same in 10 minutes and in 15 to 25 minutes increase the PH level approximately 7 and then in the last minutes PH level is catch the peak level.

As an overall perspective, it can be observed that given the three types of sweet products are responsible for the tooth decay in the given time.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30054644809 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34799783895 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9899989581 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.4 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6 22.9334400587 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272390539963 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18959518002 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178748735581 0.0843802449381 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213116543294 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192579842124 0.0819641961636 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.