The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph demonstrates the cost of money which was funded by the UK for cleaning four different types of powers the year between 2008 and 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the UK authority except in 2011 all around the period they utilized most of the money cleaning the wind, while they invested the least amount of money on energy-smart technologies. Furthermore, in every year the total amount of money had an upward trend.
To begin with the features, two consecutive years 2009 and 2010 the UK spent over 5 billion pounds on cleaning the air, whereas in 2015 the amount raised to twice compared with those years. From 2011 to 2014 the amount had continued to grow. Though in 2008 and 2009 no money was spent to clean solar power, in 2014 the highest amount was invested which was approximately 4 billion pounds. In the case of the other three years, it remained almost level off. All around the period, the utilization of money on smart-energy technologies had the lowest than all other features.
Turning to the total amount of money, in 2008 the total amount remained bellow 5 billion pounds after that in the next three running year it remained the same which was closed to 7 billion. Then it started to rising gradually and in the final year, it stood at 15 billion pounds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7025862069 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41080094717 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9600737359 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178506461618 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714063885457 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526997581574 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119490032439 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398744170074 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.