The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares four different countries including UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal in terms of the average amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person from 1967 to 2007.
In general, it is clear that while the amount of CO2 emissions per person in British was the highest, the figures for Italy and Portugal was the lowest over a period of 40 years. The figure for Sweden witnessed the fluctuation during this period.
In 1967, while the average amount of CO2 emissions per person in the UK was the highest, at around 11 tones, the figure for Portugal was the lowest, at nearly 2 tones. One Swedish people emitted an average of almost 9 tones, compared to about 4 tones per person in Italy.
While the amount of CO2 emissions per person in UK and Sweden decreased between 1967 and 2007, the figures for Italy and Portugal increased significantly during this period. The figure for the British declined slightly to nearly 9 tons in 2007. The most dramatic increase was seen in Portugal, which went up by about 4 tones from just under 2 tons in 1967 to nearly 6 tons in 2007. Similarly, the amount of CO2 emissions per person in Italy grew gradually to approximately 8 tons in 2007. The figure for Sweden reached a peak at over 10 tons in 1977, then fell rapidly to under 6 tons in 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57939914163 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39793976668 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454935622318 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6888474295 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.7 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260891973235 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127466376665 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907684255481 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18892724092 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621537554847 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.