The given line graph compares as well as contrasts the amount of CO2 in metric tonnes which was emitted by per capita in four separate European nations. This comparison that was statistically illustrated, commenced in 1967 and presumed until 2007.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent from the data supplied by this figure that while CO2 emission in metric tonnes experienced a substantial drop in both United Kingdom and Sweden, This gas emission witnessed a remarkable growth in another two countries that are Italy and Portugal. It is also worthy to note that British residents released the most Co2 compared to other nations, though quite the opposite the least amount of CO2 was discharged by Portuguese people in a period of 40 years.
As palpably can be seen by this diagram, in 1977 both UK and Sweden were recorded as the two highest CO2 releaser that were more than 10 metric tonnes in quantity. However, clearly the amount of this gas which was emitted by Italian and Portuguese people was recognized less than this number according to statistics that were more than 6 alongside 2 metric tonnes respectively.
Taken a precise glance at the diagram would provide some information related to the conversions in 1987 in which Swiss besides Italian residents discharged same amount of CO2 that was almost 7 in metric tonnes.Considering other changes in the same year, declining the amount of CO2 from almost 11 to under 10 metric tonnes can be categorized as a marginal change, nonetheless Portuguese people CO2 emission plummeted remarkably to almost 3 metric tonnes.Moreover and proven by this line graph that Co2 emission was in a same quantity of almost 5 metric tonnes in both Portugal and Sweden ,on the strike contrast Italy saw 8 metric tonnes and following this UK was still ranked first by the quantity of 8 metric tonnes in the last year of comparison.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graph compares as well as...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced in 1967 and presumed until 2007. Looking from an overall perspective, it ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uese people in a period of 40 years. As palpably can be seen by this diagram,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngside 2 metric tonnes respectively. Taken a precise glance at the diagram wo...
^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Considering
... CO2 that was almost 7 in metric tonnes.Considering other changes in the same year, declini...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ed remarkably to almost 3 metric tonnes.Moreover and proven by this line graph that Co2 ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ed remarkably to almost 3 metric tonnes.Moreover and proven by this line graph that Co2 ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 591, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...etric tonnes in both Portugal and Sweden ,on the strike contrast Italy saw 8 metri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98738170347 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82003754029 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511041009464 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 283.868780488 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 204.814500443 43.030603864 476% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 225.857142857 112.824112599 200% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.2857142857 22.9334400587 197% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4285714286 5.23603664747 256% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118721093393 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637563144835 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035860725905 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836308936078 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358800199594 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.7 13.2329268293 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 10.3012195122 191% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.