The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned graph illustrates average carbon dioxide emitted by each person between 1967 and 2007 of four different countries of the world : United kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal.
Overall, as is represented by the graph, it is clear that British people were responsible for throwing significantly high amount of CO2 whereas Portuguese had emitted relatively low amount of CO2 as comparison to other countries.
It is evident from the graph that during 1967 British citizens released the highest amount of CO2 which was more than 10 metric tonnes but after 1967 it can be observed that the amount of CO2 produced gradually decreased. Similarly, Swedish people threw near about 9 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide while this amount significantly grew and reached approximately 10 metric tonnes 1977 but immediately after 1977 sharp decrement can be noticed upto 1987 then after this year the value steadily dropped.
Moreover, Italian people exhaled nearly 5 metric tonnes in beginning years but the value slightly rose and reached around 6 metric tonnes which further gradually increased upto 1997 and obtained the steady state from 1997 to 2007. Furthermore, Swedish produced only 2 metric tonnes which moderately surged upto 1977 and it rapidly grew from 1987 to 1997 and maintained stable state from 1997 to 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Italy
...es of the world : United kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal. Overall, as is represe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t can be observed that the amount of CO2 produced gradually decreased. Similarly,...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificantly grew and reached approximately 10 metric tonnes 1977 but immediately af...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased upto 1997 and obtained the steady state from 1997 to 2007. Furthermore, Sw...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32857142857 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64591685264 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.3761532988 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.5 112.824112599 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14281590397 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881259301704 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976585814455 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116399339368 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106563687281 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.2329268293 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.