The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph above illustrates mean carbon dioxide production per capita in four countries in the years between 1967 and 2007. units are measured in metric tonnes.
Overall, average carbon dioxide emission was the highest in the united kingdom, whereas it was the lowest in portugal. over the given period, carbon dioxide production declined in the united kingdom and sweden. In contrast, portugal and italy had opposite trends.
In 1967, each person released almost 11 metric tonnes co2 on average, in the UK, and this number gradually dropped to 9 by 2007. In sweden, average co2 production per person was nearly 9 metric tonnes. Before decreasing by 4 metric tonnes in 2007, it peaked to almost 11.
In 1967, In portugal co2 emission was 1 metric tonne per capita. By 2007, it saw a significant rise to slightly over 5 metric tonnes. Similar trends were seen in italy, where an average person produced 4 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide, and this number doubled by 2007.
- In recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 78
- Many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and are using the internet to socialise with others.What problems do children face when going online without parental supervision?How can these problems be solved? 67
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above illustrates mean carbon dioxide p...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Units
...ies in the years between 1967 and 2007. units are measured in metric tonnes. ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
... whereas it was the lowest in portugal. over the given period, carbon dioxide produc...
^^^^
Line 11, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... number gradually dropped to 9 by 2007. In sweden, average co2 production per pers...
^^
Line 16, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oxide, and this number doubled by 2007.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10909090909 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41464767947 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9000489839 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6363636364 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431333687608 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157414353234 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821626996116 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255901055714 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517842600468 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.