The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph unveils the statistics of a country including, United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal on the secretion of carbon-dioxide by each individual in forty years.
Overall, the emission of carbon dioxide is found to be following a similar pattern in Italy and Portugal which had an increasing trend with countable fluctuation. In Contrast, the United Kingdom and Sweden had a downfall in which the former had a steady decline and the latter one reached to its highest, at once during the first decade. And fell correspondingly for the next ten years after which it had gradual declination.
In the initial year, 1967 discharge of carbon-dioxide in Italy was slightly above than four metric ton which in the next ten year reached to above six metric ton. After that in the year 1997, the data reached near to eight and levelled off since. Similarly, in Portugal, the emission was at its minimum around one metric ton and in the next 20 years, it showed steady increment. Subsequently, the statistics had drastic raise for some time ahead of 1997 and it stabilized.
On the contrary, Sweden after a drastic increment had its highest peak of the first ten years in 1997, reaching to above ten metric ton which then fell vividly till 1987, reaching the point of around seven metric tons, and for the rest of the time it followed steady declination, reaching to the record of six metric tons. Regarding the United Kingdom, the statistic had steady downfall for the entire period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t once during the first decade. And fell correspondingly for the next ten years a...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...steady downfall for the entire period.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, similarly, so, then, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93675889328 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66393778937 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509881422925 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4707236708 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168867840752 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779879292365 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855784396555 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115572662635 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101293980352 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.