The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The above chart demonstrates the medium amount of emission of carbon dioxide in metric tons in 4 various countries in the particular period of time between 1967 until 2007.
Overall, it is clear that while both Portugal and Italy increased their emission during this time, United Kingdom and Sweden declined theirs.
On the one hand, although Portugal had under 2 tones, it rose its release gradually to 5 tons in 1997 and then remained still until the end. At the beginning of this period, Italy had near 4 tons of carbon dioxide emission which was soared to more than 6 in 1977 and then reached the amount of almost 8 in 1977 which like Portugal continued to be until 2007.
On the other hand, Sweden had a steady increase in 1977 with more than 10 tons which fell dramatically to near 6 ten years later. After that, it kept to have a decline until the end to almost 5 tons per person. Unlike Sweden which had noticeable change in its graph, United Kingdom had a really gradual decrease from almost 11 to near 8 tons of emission.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n 4 various countries in the particular period of time between 1967 until 2007. Overall, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'kept having'.
Suggestion: kept having
... near 6 ten years later. After that, it kept to have a decline until the end to almost 5 ton...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
really, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55614973262 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30640663531 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6042188664 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260365291796 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117456845937 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705700825603 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165352506099 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444471164356 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.