The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph illustrates information about the amount of workers using three diffenrent means of transport fro every single day in Uk during a 60-year period.
Overall, the figure for car users and bus users to travel experienced an upward trend, while the proportion of people using train for travelling saw a downward trend from 1970 to 2030.
In 1970, the number of people who use car for travelling was by far the highest, at around 5 million, followed by a dramatic increase to 9 million at the end of the given period. At the same year, that of bus commuters and train users started at 4 and 2 million respectively.
A slight decline of a million, from 4 million to less than 3 million in the figure for bus commuters was recorded from 1970 to 2030. In contrast, the quantity of people using train for vacations exceeded that of bus users, and continued to soar to under 5 million in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | 10 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 61
- More people are able to travel for work and tourism than in the past Some people think this has had a positive impact Others worry about the negative effects this is having on the environment and the harm this will cause individual cultures 95
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ing three diffenrent means of transport fro every single day in Uk during a 60-year...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56172839506 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59914662463 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549382716049 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.9467119323 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244630491886 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120453672296 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295140027143 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140039116489 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332108479704 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.