The given line graph illustrates the number of people travelling by three different types of vehicles (car, bus and train) over a period of 60 years.
It is noticeable that the passengers using car and train to transport have been increasing steadily since 1970. On the contrary, the figures for bus commuters tend to decline gradually throughout the period shown.
Car is the most popular forms of transport as can be seen from the graph. There was a substantial growth by around 2 million people driving to work between 1970 and 2010. Approximately 75 million people will use cars as daily transport by 2020, and this figure is expected to reach 9 million in 2030.
On the other hand, bus and train were used by 4 million and 2 million workers respectively in 1970. While the number of bus users has been experiencing a gradual decrease, the number of commuting rail passengers has been increaseing considerably. The figure of train travellers was above 3.5 million in 2015, at the same level with bus commuters, and will continue to rise to 4.5 million in 2030. By contrast, buses are predicted to become the least popular choices at the end of the period, with only 3 million daily users.
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 67
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Manchester University in 1937 1967 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 84
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79710144928 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66658790054 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599033816425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4859143182 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.3 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261516620261 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103289926457 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532251588319 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16568397568 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341490252667 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.