The given line graph describes the amount of acid rain emissions produced from 4 typical sources over a period of 17 years in the UK.
It is clear that there was a substantial decrease in the total amount of acid rain emissions. The most dramatic fall was seen in the electricity, gas and water supply sector.
In 1990, approximately 3.3 million tones acid rain emission came from electricity, gas and water supply. On the other hand, other industries category contributed the second largest amount of acid rain emissions, with above 2 million tonnes, while domestic and transportation/communiction were only responsible for around 0.75 million tonnes each.
The amount of acid rain emission from electricity, gas and water supply reduced steeply from 1991 to 2007, and stood at just about 0.5 million tonnes at the end of the period shown. There was also a decline in the figure for other industries and domestic by 1 million and 0.3 million tonnes respectively. On the contrary, the amount of acid rain emitting from transport/communication fluctuated throughout the period, reaching at 1 million tonnes in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
... water supply. On the other hand, other industries category contributed the second largest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17582417582 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35762392913 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2798133113 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334172147107 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155456398966 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712514827553 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199772902473 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067505881993 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.