A glance at the graph provided reveals changes in three different items, which are salt, fish and meat, of the food by Chinese people within a time span of twenty five years.
Overall, tendencies of use of meat and salt have not fluctuation whereas line use of fish have a few fluctuations. That size of use of fish led to about 850 grams in 2010 is more high about 4.2 times than use of salt or meat
According to line of use of fish, short-term growth and fall is observed in between 1985 years and 1995 years and then it gradually increased to 2010 years. Firstly, consumption of fish increased by about 100 grams from approximately 600 grams to 700 grams from 1985 years to 1990 years and decreased to 1995 years and reached to exactly 600 grams. After that, a smooth increase started and continued to 2010 years and use of fish reached to around 850 grams.
If we look at line of use of salt and fish, consumption of meat slowly rose from about 100 grams to exactly 200 grams by 100 grams from 1985 years to 2010 years while a moderate fall of use of salt started from a little less than 500 grams to 200 grams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...about 4.2 times than use of salt or meat According to line of use of fish, short-...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34285714286 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27250149363 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0136596728 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122319169679 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668767426481 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470371441591 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816642202556 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472178067317 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.