In modern days, one of the controversial problems is related to an increase in information that plays a fundamental role in society. Although some people agree that new news needs to be shared to possible each person, the rest of them strongly believe that some facts are so important and should not be freely reached to society. In this essay, I will support both views with reasons and represent a conclusion.
On one side of the argument, there are people who claim that the information is for the public because, in the twenty-first century, it is obvious for people and just like the flow of a river from which everyone can drink. The primary reason for believing this is that all facts that happened between past and present are placed on the internet, and everyone can see these things. One important illustration of this is that if someone wants to know actions occurring in scientific study, a business of trade and exchange, and university in 2015, it is inevitable that finding this information from the internet is a piece of cake.
On the other hand, it is also possible to argue that information is just like a property we buy because some information is not found as the products we use. People often have this opinion because the knowledge gained by a lot of effort is freely used by another person, which is an injustice. A particularly good example is that lessons of universities are secret for the public, and students pay money to a university in order to get these valuable pieces of information that placed in a brain of tutors.
In conclusion, as we have seen, this question is uneasy to discuss. Nowadays some information is spread out by the internet but important some of this is being valued. My view is that in the information century, information has to be shared with all people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to people'.
Suggestion: obvious to people
...use, in the twenty-first century, it is obvious for people and just like the flow of a river from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72239747634 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73205425477 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517350157729 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4185413337 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3253385226 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112343937594 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081878412035 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201057310674 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658714913172 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.