The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The given line graph depicts changes in consuming three kinds of food by the population of China over the period from 1985 to 2010. Overall, it can be clearly seen that fish and meat consumption increased, while consuming salt decreased.
According to the graph, it is vividly shown that, consuming fish products was always the highest amongst other two types of food in China. So, in 1985, the amount of fish consumption was nearly 600 grams of fish per week per person, which then increased gradually by 1990 to around 700 grams per week. Then, it dipped slightly from 700 to 600 grams per week. However, consuming fish reached a peak of almost 850 grams per week per person.
On the other hand, in 1985, meat consumption was not so popular as salt. Although, consuming salt fell steadily to just over 200 grams per week per person by 2010, while demand for meat doubled from 100 to 200 grams per week per person, and ended at the same level as salt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...consumption was nearly 600 grams of fish per week per person, which then increase...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6081871345 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22965822671 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0543157587 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118354899333 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068523231249 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728370424617 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106540620848 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677484436314 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.