The graph below shows changes in young adult unempolyment rates in England between 1993 and 2012.
The line chart illustrates the percentage of young adults in England who are unemployed from 1993 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the unemployment rate in London was consistently higher than that in the rest of England. Moreover, the proportion of jobless adults in the 16-24 age category dominated overall England.
In 1993, the people without a job in the 16 -24 age group was the highest at over 20%, then decreased sharply to 15% in 1999 and climbed significantly at 25 % in 2012. Meanwhile, although the percentage of unemployed people age 16-24 in the rest of England started at 17% in 1993, then jumped gradually to 20% in 2012. Over a period of time, the figure for people from 16 to 14 in the rest of the England age group lagged in London by a remarkable margin.
There was a dramatic decrease in the proportion of jobless adults in overall London from 14% to 7% between 1993 and 2008, then less substantially in the next period. Likewise, the rates for people who come from the overall rest of England was the lowest at 10% in 1993. After declining noticeable at under 5% from 1995 to 2004, the figure for unemployment rates experienced a minimal increase of 8% in 2012.
practice
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...jumped gradually to 20% in 2012. Over a period of time, the figure for people from 16 to 14 in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Practice
...nced a minimal increase of 8% in 2012. practice
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65566037736 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68824339674 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4563291022 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21825967129 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110067871796 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610344915427 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167532654059 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627122466499 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.