The graph below shows cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain.
The grapb below show the changing pattern of access to modern technology in homes in the Uk
The graph illustrates the changing pattern in term of the access to 4 modern technological equipment in home in the uk over the period of 14 years.
Overall, the proportion of modern technology per family in the uk had a tendency to increase dramatically, especially the percentage of mobile phone usage and internet connection. Similarly, the fingure for cd player and dvd player increased sharply.
in 1994/95, about 48% of home had cd player without the appearance of dvd player, mobile phone usage and internet connection. Between 1996/96 and 2002/03, the percentage of dvd player stood at 30% whereas the fingure for mobile phone and the internet was under 20% and 180% respectively.
from 2002 to 2005, there had been a considerable increase of nearly 50% in the quantity of dvd player. It surpassed the amount of mobile phone for the first time in 2005 and exceeded that of internet connection for the first time in 2007. By 2008, the percentage of dvd player got much higher than 3 other technological equipments with under 90% while the corresponding fingure for cd player, mobile usage and the internet was 83%,79% and 65%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...yer and dvd player increased sharply. in 1994/95, about 48% of home had cd playe...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
... was under 20% and 180% respectively. from 2002 to 2005, there had been a consider...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96335078534 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84671390377 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8432475459 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803428396222 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049332985 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087846089038 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089316684551 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107169811241 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.