The graph below shows consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010
The line graph gives information about the average money spent annually on mobile phone services, and national and international landline services in America from 2001 to 2010.
In general, it can be seen that the expenditure people spent on mobile phones and national fixed line increased significantly, while national fixed-line services had a downward trend. Also, the figure for international fixed-line services was the lowest on the chart.
In the first half of the period, Americans spent $700 on national landline phones compared to over $200 on mobile phones and international fixed-line services. Over the next five years, the number of people using national fixed-line services significantly fell by $150, while yearly spending on overseas landline services was stable at approximately $300 and $100 less than the mobile phone.
Between 2006 and 2010, the expenditure on national fixed-line services continually decreased from $500 to $400, while mobile phones underwent a significant increase before outlooking national lines. $450 people spent on oversea landline services less than cell phone services
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57738095238 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92958146539 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6272995038 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420696467628 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227143784843 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087035786769 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300930327564 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779454077623 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.