The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and
international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and
international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates the average amount of money spent yearly on mobile phones, national and
international landline phones in the US over a period of 9 years.
It is clear that while the yearly spending on mobile phones increased significantly, the opposite was true
for national landline phone expenditure. Also, the figure for international fixed-line service was lowest
during the period.
In 2001, there was an average of nearly $700 spent on national landline phones by US residents, in
comparison with only around $200 each on mobile phones and international landline services. Over the
next five years, the average amount poured into national fixed-line phones fell by approximately $200.
By constrast, yearly spending on cell phones witnessed a significant increase of roughly $300. At the
same time, the figure for overseas landline services fluctuated slightly below $300.
In 2006, US consumers spent the same amount of money on mobile and national fixed-line services,
with just over $500 on each. From the year 2006 onwards, it can be seen that the average yearly
expenditure on mobile phones surpassed that on national fixed-line phones and mobile phones became
the most common means of communication. To be specific, yearly spending on mobile phone services
increased to nearly $750 in the last year, while the figure for national landline phone ones decreased to
about $400 at the end of the period. During the same period, there was a stability in the figure for
overseas phone calls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt yearly on mobile phones, national and international landline phones in the US ...
^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed significantly, the opposite was true for national landline phone expenditure....
^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernational fixed-line service was lowest during the period. In 2001, there wa...
^^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal landline phones by US residents, in comparison with only around 00 each on m...
^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nternational landline services. Over the next five years, the average amount pour...
^^^
Line 11, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant increase of roughly 00. At the same time, the figure for overseas landl...
^^^
Line 14, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mobile and national fixed-line services, with just over 00 on each. From the year...
^^^
Line 15, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., it can be seen that the average yearly expenditure on mobile phones surpassed t...
^^^
Line 16, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xed-line phones and mobile phones became the most common means of communication. ...
^^^
Line 17, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yearly spending on mobile phone services increased to nearly 50 in the last year,...
^^^
Line 18, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ational landline phone ones decreased to about 00 at the end of the period. Durin...
^^^
Line 19, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... there was a stability in the figure for overseas phone calls.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29218106996 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78225215009 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460905349794 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.503973126 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.909090909 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253704826686 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116066949264 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474060179155 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1012057715 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644862194394 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.