The line-graph highlights data about consumers’average per annum amount of money spent in cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America, a nine-year between 2001 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen that there was a considerable upward trend in the expenditure of cell phone, whereas the national fixed-line services’expense saw a substantial fall over the period.
In 2001, around 700 dollars which was the highest expenditure came from national fixed-line services sector, then plummeted the next five years, at which point it levelled off at just 500 dollars, the same as cell phone in 2006. International fixed-line and services made up for about 230 dollars of the amount of money in comparsion with 200 dollars cell phone counterparts. The consumers’average expense of international fixed-line and services increased slowly but surely from 2001 to 2006.
There was a significantly plunge in the amount of money spent in national fixed-line services, reaching clearly 400 dollars. Standing at 750 dollars, the expenditure of cell phone was almost 2.5 times as much as that of international fixed-line and services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('plunge') instead of another adjective.
...t surely from 2001 to 2006. There was a significantly plunge in the amount of money spent in nationa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5393258427 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64005060931 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0779852033 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393012090401 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20233941799 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102896070899 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289108958109 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118717706192 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.