The graph below shows consumers’ average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The line graph demonstrates the average money spent on three separate means of communication yearly by citizens of America from 2001 to 2010.
From an overall perspective, it is obvious that while the expenditure on cell phone services experienced a sharp upward trend, the opposite was true for the amount of money paid for national fixed-line services. Also, the figure for international fixed-line services almost underwent no change throughout the period.
Starting at 700$ in 2001, the spending on national fixed-line services was the dominant item, compared to merely around 200$ of the other two categories. Over the next 5 years, this figure, however, dropped considerably by 200$. On the contrary, there was a significant growth to 500$ in that of cell phone services. At the same time, the expenses for international fixed-line services fluctuated a little bit before reaching a plateau at 300$.
In 2006, the figures for cell phone services and national fixed-line services were the same at 500$. From the year 2006 onwards, the expenditure on the former items surpassed that of the latter and became the most popular method of contact. To be more detailed, annually spending on cell phone services rose to about 750$ in the final year, whereas the figure for national fixed-line services witnessed a rapid fall by 100$. During the same period, there was stability in the figure for internet fixed-line services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$700'.
Suggestion: $700
...nge throughout the period. Starting at 700$ in 2001, the spending on national fixed...
^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...ominant item, compared to merely around 200$ of the other two categories. Over the n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...igure, however, dropped considerably by 200$. On the contrary, there was a significa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...rary, there was a significant growth to 500$ in that of cell phone services. At the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...tional fixed-line services fluctuated a little bit before reaching a plateau at 300$. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...little bit before reaching a plateau at 300$. In 2006, the figures for cell phone s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$500'.
Suggestion: $500
...al fixed-line services were the same at 500$. From the year 2006 onwards, the expend...
^^^^
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$750'.
Suggestion: $750
...ng on cell phone services rose to about 750$ in the final year, whereas the figure f...
^^^^
Line 4, column 419, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$100'.
Suggestion: $100
...line services witnessed a rapid fall by 100$. During the same period, there was stab...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23043478261 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79260771413 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569565217391 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6264987009 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.363636364 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366812163888 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140075195236 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804008405277 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223890144389 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248618610452 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.